Health Care

E à margem da noite de ontem, Paul Krugman na sua coluna do NY Times explica as diferenças entre as propostas do Health Care de Obama e Hillary, através de um estudo de um economista especialista nestas matérias do MIT.

Obama, neste quadro, não sai bem:

«Mr. Gruber finds that a plan without mandates, broadly resembling the Obama plan, would cover 23 million of those currently uninsured, at a taxpayer cost of $102 billion per year. An otherwise identical plan with mandates [Hillary plan] would cover 45 million of the uninsured — essentially everyone — at a taxpayer cost of $124 billion. Over all, the Obama-type plan would cost $4,400 per newly insured person, the Clinton-type plan only $2,700.»

Uma boa explicação para os resultados de ontem...?